Comparison between two bone supported distalizers: bone supported pendulum (bsp) and the dual force distalizer (dfd). Long term

dc.contributor.author	Oberti Echandia, Giovanni
dc.contributor.author	Villegas, Carlos
dc.contributor.author	Carvajal, Juan Felipe
dc.contributor.author	Tiziano, Baccetti
dc.date.accessioned	2022-11-30T18:58:41Z
dc.date.available	2022-11-30T18:58:41Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10946/7243
dc.description.abstract	In the treatment of Class II malocclusions different techniques have been used to distalize upper molars with the purpose of obtaining a Class I molar relationship, avoiding the extraction of premolars. A great variety of intra and extraoral distalizing systems with dental anchorage have been used for this purpose, several difficulties with these devices related to the loss of anchorage have been found, among them are: labialization of upper anterior teeth, inclination of molars and lack of cooperation of the patient 9 For this reason, several intraoral appliances that don’t require dental anchorage but a bone supported anchorage have been used	spa
dc.language.iso	en	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad CES	spa
dc.subject	Department of Orthodontics	spa
dc.subject	Student of Orthodontics	spa
dc.subject	Treatment results	spa
dc.subject	Supported Distalizers	spa
dc.subject	Malocclusions	spa
dc.title	Comparison between two bone supported distalizers: bone supported pendulum (bsp) and the dual force distalizer (dfd). Long term	spa
dc.type	Trabajo de Grado	spa
dc.rights.accessrights	info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess	spa
datacite.rights	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb	spa